Gavin Newsom’s Hollywood Bailout

Gov. Gavin Newsom spent the past year celebrating a massive expansion of California’s Hollywood tax credit program, boosting it to a record $750 million a year. Then his own budget managed to kneecap it. 

Now Sacramento is scrambling to fix one of the governor’s biggest political headaches. 

More than three dozen California lawmakers—including senior Democrat legislators—are urging Newsom to reverse a budget provision they say will cripple Hollywood’s newly expanded tax credits. 

Sacramento expanded Hollywood’s subsidy with one hand while quietly weakening it with the other. 

Lawmakers now say a broader corporate tax credit limitation buried in the state budget inadvertently swept up the very film tax credits they had spent months promoting. Assembly Democrat Caucus Chair Rick Chavez Zbur, who helped write the original expansion, said members believed a carve-out for film credits had already been secured before the budget vote. 

Just months after celebrating the historic expansion, Newsom signed a budget extending broader limits on the use of corporate tax credits. Through 2029, companies generally remain limited to claiming $5 million in credits annually. Beginning in 2030, they generally will be limited to claiming either $5 million or 70% of their California tax liability in a given year, whichever is greater. Hollywood says this change significantly diminishes the value of the newly expanded incentive. 

TRENDING ARTICLES

breaking

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham Dies at 71

Tyler O’Neil

opinion

Damning Reports Show How Deep New York Is Mired in Blue State Doom Loop

Jarrett Stepman

opinion

Victor Davis Hanson: Why Mamdani Wants to Erase Europeans From New York’s Immigration History

Victor Davis Hanson

The result was a bizarre contradiction: Lawmakers increased the subsidy on paper while simultaneously limiting the extent to which many companies could actually claim the credits. 

This is Newsom’s budget. He proudly signed it. If that budget accidentally kneecapped one of his signature Hollywood initiatives, the responsibility begins with him. 

The episode is both embarrassing and revealing. Because beneath the legislative fumble lies a much bigger story about how California governs. 

The problem with these tax credits has little to do with Hollywood. It has to do with government deciding which industries deserve special treatment and which are left to fend for themselves. California imposes one of the nation’s most expensive business climates, then selectively hands out tax breaks to politically favored industries as compensation. 

That’s a politicized tax policy. 

Manufacturers don’t receive Hollywood-sized carve-outs. Family-owned restaurants don’t. Independent retailers don’t. Thousands of California employers simply pay the state’s high taxes, navigate its regulations, and hope they can survive. 

Hollywood gets a government subsidy. 

Supporters argue that the credits are necessary because other states aggressively recruit film production. It’s true that Georgia, New Mexico, and others have built generous incentive programs to lure studios away. 

But that argument raises an even more uncomfortable question. If California has become so expensive that Sacramento must continually subsidize one favored industry just to keep it from leaving, perhaps the real problem isn’t the size of the tax credit. 

Perhaps it’s California. 

Instead of fixing the business climate for everyone, Sacramento keeps creating carve-outs, exemptions, and targeted subsidies for the industries with the greatest political influence. 

The government is choosing winners and losers. California doesn’t really have a coherent tax policy anymore, so much as it has a tax code filled with political exceptions. 

Which brings us back to Hollywood. 

Hollywood isn’t just one of California’s most iconic industries. It is one of the Democratic Party’s most valuable political assets, generating campaign contributions, celebrity endorsements, elite fundraisers, and the kind of national political validation every Democratic presidential hopeful craves. 

That makes this budget mistake different from almost any other. If Sacramento accidentally undercut tax credits benefiting manufacturers or family-owned businesses, would lawmakers rush to pass corrective legislation? Maybe, maybe not. 

Hollywood, however, doesn’t have to wonder. When Hollywood calls, Sacramento answers. 

Hollywood has every right to lobby for its interests. Every industry does. The real question is why Hollywood almost always finds lawmakers sprinting to its rescue while millions of ordinary Californians are told to get in line. That answer has far more to do with politics than economics. 

As Newsom continues positioning himself for what increasingly looks like a presidential campaign, the last constituency he can afford to alienate is Hollywood. It has fueled Democratic fundraising, celebrity activism, and campaign infrastructure for decades—the kind of national validation any Democrat eyeing 2028 needs badly. 

That’s why this story isn’t really about a drafting error buried deep inside a budget bill. It’s about political priorities. 

Newsom’s own budget created a problem for one of California’s most politically connected industries. Now the pressure is on to solve it—and fast. 

Watch how quickly this gets fixed. 

California families have spent years asking Sacramento for relief from soaring taxes, unaffordable housing, skyrocketing insurance premiums, and an increasingly hostile business climate. They are routinely told change takes time. 

Hollywood probably won’t have to wait. 

Newsom’s budget created this mess. His presidential ambitions will almost certainly clean it up. 

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of the Daily Signal.