Victims Demand Inquiry Into Sanctuary Policies in Virginia and Illinois

A republic is not ordinarily undone by a single dramatic stroke. Instead, it is softened by evasions—failures to comply with rules and failures by officials to do their duties. And so, the present controversies in Fairfax County, Virginia, and in Cook and Lake counties, Illinois, are not merely another quarrel over immigration policy. They are a test of whether the criminal justice system still remembers its first obligation: to protect the innocent; to punish the guilty; and to act without fear, favor, or ideological embellishment.

The radical rogue prosecutors in these jurisdictions have failed on all of these counts.

That is why the formal complaints filed by the Victim Rights Reform Council merit more than perfunctory attention from the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. On behalf of families whose loved ones were killed by foreign nationals unlawfully present in the country, the council has asked Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon to examine whether local and state officials have engaged in a pattern and practice of discriminatory conduct—conduct that, in operation if not in slogan, appears to elevate the interests of illegal aliens above the rights of citizens and lawful residents.

The cry for help comes from mothers and fathers who have buried their children while local public officials congratulated themselves on their humanitarian posture for failing to prosecute—or for giving unduly lenient sentences to—those who committed heinous crimes.

The Fairfax complaint, submitted on April 21, centers on allegations that the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office (under Soros rogue prosecutor Steve Descano) has extended preferential treatment to criminal defendants whose cases carry adverse immigration consequences, while declining meaningful cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Descano’s radical policies were thrust into public view when the U.S. House Judiciary Committee examined Fairfax’s policies in May. There, the country was given a window into what many citizens had suspected all along: that prosecutorial discretion, once understood as an instrument of prudence, has been weaponized and converted into prosecutorial nullification. 

TRENDING ARTICLES

opinion

Senate GOP Leaders Pull a Bait-and-Switch With Reconciliation 3.0

Deroy Murdock

opinion

Victor Davis Hanson: Saluting Tulsi, Slamming Schiff

Victor Davis Hanson

opinion

Victor Davis Hanson Exposes What Fascism Actually Looks Like

Victor Davis Hanson

The council represents Cheryl Minter, whose daughter, Stephanie Minter, was allegedly murdered (all are presumed innocent until proven guilty—though the evidence here appears overwhelming) in Fairfax County on Feb. 23 by Abdul Jalloh, a Sierra Leone national unlawfully in the U.S.

The allegations are harrowing not merely because of the crime itself, but because they describe a sequence of warnings ignored and charges repeatedly abandoned. Jalloh, according to the complaint, had amassed at least 30 prior arrests and had been identified by law enforcement as a grave danger to the community. Yet despite those warnings, Descano dropped the charges, case after case. It is difficult to imagine a more devastating illustration of what happens when public authority ceases to regard public safety as its lodestar.

The legal theory advanced by the complainants is straightforward.

Under 34 U.S.C. § 12601, the attorney general may investigate a governmental authority that engages in a pattern or practice of conduct depriving persons of rights secured by the Constitution or federal law.

The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment is not a decorative flourish in our constitutional architecture; it is a command. If a prosecutor’s office systematically adjusts charging, plea bargaining, or sentencing policies so that immigration status becomes a favored category—if, in effect, one class of offenders receives a pass denied to others—then the question is no longer political rhetoric. It is a civil rights question.

Illinois presents the same moral disorder, enlarged by state policy and wrapped in the sanctimonious language of reform. In a separate complaint dated May 20, the council asked the Civil Rights Division to investigate the state of Illinois, Gov. J.B. Pritzker, officials in Cook and Lake counties, Cook County State’s Attorney Eileen Burke, and others for what it describes as systemic enforcement failures, discriminatory pretrial practices, and sanctuary measures that have produced a predictable preference for illegal aliens over the ordinary claims of justice.

The family of Megan Bos has become, unwillingly and tragically, an emblem of that disorder. Bos, a Lake County resident, was found dead on the property of Jose Luis Mendoza-Gonzalez, a Mexican national alleged to have concealed her body for weeks. Because Illinois law permitted the illegal alien’s release following his initial court appearance, the Bos family was made to endure the additional humiliation of watching the accused remain at liberty while Bos’ death cried out for resolution.

The complainants invoke both the equal protection clause and the due process clause in addition to the relevant statutory provision. And rightly so. Equal protection means that the law does not ration its concern according to ideological taste. Due process means that the government may not play fast and loose with its most elementary responsibility to secure life and liberty. To say this is not to demand vengeance; it is to insist upon order.

A justice system that grows exquisitely sensitive to the collateral consequences of unlawful offenders while growing numb to the grief of victims has not become more enlightened. It has become morally unserious and dangerous.

This, then, is the task before the Department of Justice: to determine whether government actors, clothed with public trust, have administered criminal justice in a manner incompatible with federal law and constitutional equality.

If the allegations are substantiated, a federal investigation into Fairfax County and into Illinois’ relevant policies would do more than expose administrative failure. It would reaffirm a core proposition that progressives often find inconvenient: that government exists first to preserve civil peace, and that mercy severed from responsibility quickly becomes cruelty by proxy.

Kudos to the Victims’ Rights Reform Council for doing what too many officials would prefer no one do at all: forcing these cases into the clear light of law. The ball is now in the Justice Department’s court. Let the Civil Rights Division proceed soberly, rigorously, and without theatricality—but let it proceed.

If public officials are indeed favoring illegal aliens at the expense of the lives and safety of the people they are sworn to serve, then the scandal is not merely local. It is constitutional. And it deserves an answer worthy of our nation.