Obama Judge Blocks Trump Effort to Redirect Teen Pregnancy Funds Away From Planned Parenthood Affiliates

A Barack Obama-appointed judge partially blocked a Trump administration effort to curb Planned Parenthood funding in a teen pregnancy prevention program.

U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper of the District of Columbia on Wednesday also called the administration’s promotion of abstinence-only education a means to “defy social reality.”

The Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program funded about 50 organizations and included grants to affiliates of Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, as well as local government entities.

As the Daily Signal first reported, the Department of Health and Human Services in June sent letters to grant recipients determining many of them violated the law by using curricula that are “medically inaccurate,” “age-inappropriate,” and “sexually explicit.”

The agency sought to require grantees to use an abstinence-based curriculum, but Cooper said the notice of funding opportunities “acknowledge a near-absence of evidence on ‘body literacy’ approaches to pregnancy prevention.”

“And an educational initiative that counsels teens on how to avoid pregnancy without discussing the realities of unprotected intercourse and its alternatives would seem to defy social reality, common sense, and scientific evidence alike,” Cooper wrote in the case of Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

TRENDING ARTICLES

news

McKinney Mosque Vote Sparks Recall Effort Targeting Mayor, 3 Council Members

Emily Medeiros

news

83 Colleges and 26 Schools Act as a Pipeline for China’s Regime: Report

Pedro Rodriguez

opinion

Victor Davis Hanson: Tucker Carlson Is Playing a Dangerous Game

Victor Davis Hanson

Cooper granted in part a preliminary injunction blocking the Trump administration’s attempt to cut funding to the groups.

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit included Planned Parenthood of the Heartland; the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States; Hennepin County, Minnesota; and King County, Washington. The plaintiffs asserted the Department of Health and Human Services issued new funding criteria and then abruptly canceled the vast majority of active awards days later.

The judge found that the agency couldn’t lawfully impose criteria on grant recipients that Congress did not intend when creating the program in 2009.

“Under the current administration, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) has a different take on teen pregnancy,” Cooper’s opinion stated.

“In its view, the money Congress has appropriated for teen pregnancy prevention should be used only for programs that promote abstinence and ‘body literacy,’ a nebulous concept that appears to elevate fertility and marital procreation over well-tested forms of contraception and pregnancy prevention,” Cooper said.

“The agency also seeks to bar grant recipients from encouraging or ‘normalizing’ teen sexual activity, including through ‘sexually explicit’ content and discussion.”

The judge went on to note, “If HHS’s new funding notice forbids even the discussion of sexual activity by minors, one wonders how an awardee could possibly address the topic of teen pregnancy and related sexual risk behaviors, let alone work to prevent them as the appropriations act necessitates.”

Planned Parenthood celebrated the judge’s ruling.

“Every person deserves access to the information they need to make informed decisions about their lives, bodies, and futures, including America’s youth,” said Ruth Richardson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood North Central States, in a public statement.

“Today’s decision reaffirms the value of trusted, evidence-based education programs that help youth make informed choices and plan for their futures,” Richardson added. “Attacks on the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program not only put young people at risk, they also risk increasing costs for taxpayers. No one benefits from these politically motivated attacks. It’s time for them to end.”