California voters will decide this November whether politicians can receive taxpayer-funded campaign money under a ballot measure that would repeal the state’s decades-old ban on public financing.
Proposition 4, titled the Allow Public Financing of Election Campaigns Measure, will appear on the Nov. 3 statewide ballot.
If approved, the measure would allow local governments across California to establish programs that use taxpayer dollars to finance political campaigns, repealing the ban established by Proposition 73, which California voters approved in 1988 prohibiting the use of public funds for election campaigns.
Critics say the proposal would force taxpayers to subsidize political campaigns at a time when many Californians are struggling with affordability.
Several California cities already operate public campaign financing programs, including Los Angeles, Long Beach, San Francisco,Oakland, and Berkeley.
State Sen. Tom Umberg, who has championed the measure, argues that Proposition 4 would give voters, not politicians, the ability to decide whether public financing should be allowed.
TRENDING ARTICLES
“By giving Californians the chance to repeal the ban on public campaign financing, we’re ensuring that voters, not politicians or special interests, decide how elections can be financed in our state.”
However, David Kline, vice president of communications and research for the California Taxpayers Association, told The Daily Signal he disagrees with supporters’ argument that the measure would make elections fairer.
“The proponents are wrong when they say Proposition 4 would take special-interest money out of campaigns. In reality, it allows candidates to get taxpayer money and special-interest money at the same time.”
Kline argued the measure places no limit on how many candidates could receive public funding or how much taxpayer money could be distributed
.
“Proposition 4 has no limit on the number of candidates who can get taxpayer money and no limit on how much taxpayer money a candidate can get. Proposition 4 would allow tax dollars to be used on negative ads, junk mail, and more annoying text messages, rather than to pay for services to the taxpayers.”
Assemblyman David Tangipa also criticized the proposal on X, arguing that taxpayer dollars should not be used to finance political campaigns.
The proposal comes as California continues to grapple with affordability concerns. ConsumerAffairs recently ranked California the least affordable state in the nation, a point opponents have cited as they argue against expanding the use of taxpayer dollars.
Rep. Carl DeMaio, chairman of Reform California, echoed that concern.
“Californians are already forced to pay the highest taxes in the nation and we literally have seen millions of working families flee the high cost of our state – enough is enough.”
Read the first chapter of The Woketopus right now for FREE
Today, even with President Trump’s victory, leftist elites have their tentacles in every aspect of our government.
The Daily Signal’s own Tyler O’Neil exposes this leftist cabal in his new book, The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.
In this book, O’Neil reveals how the Left’s NGO apparatus pursues its woke agenda, maneuvering like an octopus by circumventing Congress and entrenching its interests in the federal government.
You can read the first chapter of this new book for FREE in this eBook, The Woketopus: Chapter One using the secure link below.
TRENDING ARTICLES
The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you.
RELATED ARTICLES
Don’t miss the
Don’t miss the signal
