Colombia, the US, and the New Hemispheric Vision

As Colombia nears a momentous election decision on May 31, conservative Abelardo de la Espriella vaults to the lead in polling and prediction markets. Known as “The Tiger,” he channels much of the energy and philosophy of another Latin American populist-right renegade, Javier Milei, who similarly uses lion imagery and themes in his campaigns.

De la Espriella faces Ivan Cepeda, a committed leftist who openly disdains the United States and has been anointed by incumbent President Gustavo Petro as the new standard-bearer of Colombia’s Left. Cepeda accused the U.S. of leading the “international neofascist far right” after President Donald Trump ordered the capture of Venezuelan strongman Nicolás Maduro, who now awaits trial in New York on drug trafficking charges.

But Colombians see matters very differently. Regarding the daring U.S. Special Forces operation to arrest and remove Maduro, 65% of Colombians approved, while only 24% disapproved of the American action. Colombian voters understand that a ruthless dictator next door poses enormous risks to their nation, including millions of refugees fleeing Venezuelan deprivation and straining Colombia’s already scarce resources.

Beyond that single military action, Colombians overwhelmingly favor closer ties with the U.S. Polling shows that 73% believe their country should grow “closer” to America, yet only 25% currently describe bilateral relations as “positive.”

Perhaps that disconnect explains another striking divide in opinion polls of Colombians: President Petro has a negative net approval of nine percentage points, while President Trump receives a nine-percentage-point positive net approval rating.

Colombians are tiring of the corruption and anti-American radicalism of the current regime and increasingly yearn for a return to stability, prosperity, and strong relations with the U.S.

TRENDING ARTICLES

opinion

Senate GOP Leaders Pull a Bait-and-Switch With Reconciliation 3.0

Deroy Murdock

opinion

What Democrats Could Say, but Aren’t. What They Are Saying, but Shouldn’t.

Victor Davis Hanson

opinion

‘How Many Times Were We Lied To?’ Fauci & Top Officials Under Fire Over COVID-19 Claims

Victor Davis Hanson

Colombians also recognize that closer U.S. ties would help combat the resurgence of violent drug cartels, which have regained tremendous power under Petro’s presidency. Allegations of Petro-Cepeda accommodation toward these criminal organizations have spread widely throughout the country, as cartel violence once again terrorizes Colombian society in ways unseen for decades.

More broadly, the rise of “The Tiger” draws momentum from the broader resurgence of conservatism across Latin America. Recent electoral victories for the Right in Costa Rica, Honduras, Bolivia, and Chile have reshaped the region’s political landscape. Those new governments join existing conservative leaders such as Milei in Argentina, Santiago Peña in Paraguay, and Nayib Bukele in El Salvador to form a growing alliance of like-minded nations throughout the hemisphere.

Indeed, the Trump administration outlined plans for such a hemispheric alliance in its National Security Strategy memorandum released last fall. The document made clear that the U.S. intends to pursue a renewed interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine—one that rejects hostile foreign intervention in the Americas while building stronger commercial, political, and military ties across the hemisphere.

That renewed focus naturally aligns with leaders who share similar philosophical commitments, including the rising Colombian star Abelardo de la Espriella. Such energy is badly needed at this moment.

Tragically, Europe—the historical cradle of Western civilization—continues to drift toward secularism, multicultural relativism, and societies overwhelmed by mass migration. It therefore falls increasingly to the New World to preserve and advance the foundations of Western civilization. From Tierra del Fuego to the U.S., current political trends suggest that this emerging hemispheric vision may well define the future.

We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of the Daily Signal.