The House of Representatives will hold a hearing tomorrow titled “Building on the ACA: Legislation to Expand Health Coverage and Lower Costs.” This hearing further confirms the left’s commitment to a single-payer health care model is alive and well.

This hearing will be held by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and is intended to mark the passage of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, which was put into place 11 years ago.

It essentially will be an opportunity for liberals in Congress to highlight 18 bills that are aimed at expanding federal control over health care. These bills fall into two broad categories: Eight fall under the umbrella of Obamacare and the insurance markets and 10 fall under the umbrella of Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

The hearing will come on the heels of the passage of the Families First Act and the American Recovery Act—both of which made significant changes expanding the federal government’s role in health care.  

The American Recovery Act—the Biden administration’s $1.9 trillion response to COVID-19—dramatically increased the federal scope of Obamacare. Particularly, it made subsidies more generous for those already eligible for subsidies, expanded access to subsidies further up the income scale, and limited premium exposure as part of overall household income.

On the Medicaid front, both the Families First Act and the American Recovery Act significantly increased federal funding to state Medicaid programs, while at the same time increased federal rules limiting state authority to administer the programs.  

There is likely more to come. Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, and others on the outside have indicated interest in making those temporary expansion provisions included in the COVID-19 relief packages permanent.

The Biden administration is already considering rolling back Trump-era flexibilities in Medicaid and Obamacare. There is also a recommitment for a government-run option—the so-called public option—as well as for a full-blown single-payer plan

These actions and the proposed legislation in the House highlight the next phases in the left’s playbook:

First, use federal funding to mask the real costs of the plan. Liberals plan to do this by throwing subsidies at both insurers, to hide the cost of coverage, and at the states, to coerce them to expand their already overstretched Medicaid programs.  

Second, consolidate enrollment in government programs by encouraging states to use an individual mandate and auto-enrollment system. This is intended to put more people on the Obamacare exchanges and push states to add and keep more people on their Medicaid programs.

Third, curb access to nongovernment-approved alternatives by restricting and effectively eliminating access to affordable, non-Obamacare-style coverage options.

Finally, strip away flexibility by linking federal dollars to federal policies. The more federal control of the dollars, the more federal rules and restrictions. The result is a one-size-fits-all federal standard.

The bottom line is this: Recent legislative acts, administrative actions, and proposed bills all have the effect of putting into place many of the mechanisms needed for a single-payer system. The best way to stop these efforts is with a better plan.

A plan that protects the policy gains over the last four years, gives people—not the government—the power to choose the kind of coverage they want, and gives the states the tools and resources to block federal consolidation and overreach is the only way we can give America the health care system it needs.

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email and we will consider publishing your remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature.