Site icon The Daily Signal

Biden-Appointed Judge’s Blistering Rebuke Could Change Trump’s Deportation Strategy

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 17: U.S. President Donald Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Andrew Giuliani (R) participate in a meeting of the White House Task Force on the FIFA World Cup 2026 in the Oval Office of the White House on November 17, 2025 in Washington, DC. The task force was created to oversee security, logistics, and federal government support for the 2025 Club World Cup and the 2026 FIFA World Cup, jointly hosted by the United States. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

President Donald Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

A Biden-appointed federal judge on Wednesday revoked the Trump administration’s policy of deporting illegal immigrants to places other than their country of origin. 

U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy issued a scathing opinion in DVD v. Department of Homeland Security. He called the administration’s deportation policy “unlawful” and accused the government of providing “false” information in the case. 

The judge, of the Massachusetts district, led his opinion with a strong characterization of the question before the court.  

“This case is about whether the government may, without notice, deport a person to the wrong country, or a country where he is likely to be persecuted, or tortured, thereby depriving that person of the opportunity to seek protections to which he would be undisputedly entitled,” Murphy’s decision says. 

If the administration appeals the ruling, it will go to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which covers Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Puerto Rico. The 1st Circuit has five Democrat appointees and one Republican appointee. 

“The Department of Homeland Security has adopted a policy whereby it may take people and drop them off in parts unknown—in so-called ‘third countries,’” Murphy wrote. 

He wrote the government’s position is, “that’s fine.” Then he added, “It is not fine, nor is it legal.”

“Congress made it ‘the policy of the United States not to expel, extradite, or otherwise effect the involuntary return of any person to a country’ where that ‘person would be in danger of being subjected to torture,’” Murphy wrote.

Murphy wrote that there is little verification of the administration’s assurances that the deported individuals won’t be tortured.

“Why has the government deemed them [the assurances] credible? How can anyone even know for certain that they exist? These are basic questions that the Constitution permits a person to ask before the Government takes away their last and only lifeline,” his ruling says.

Exit mobile version