President Joe Biden’s nominee to fill the empty seat on the Federal Trade Commission has a history of opposing immigration authorities’ use of data to enforce the law.

Alvaro Bedoya, a Georgetown Law professor and privacy advocate who is scheduled to have his committee nomination hearing Wednesday, is a staunch proponent of limiting the ability of immigration agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to collect and use data to facilitate deportations of illegal immigrants. Bedoya has criticized private companies that provide immigration agencies with citizens’ data.


“It is time to call [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] what it is: An out-of-control domestic surveillance agency that peers into all our lives,” Bedoya tweeted in February, calling for stronger privacy laws to “rein in data brokers.”

While federal data privacy legislation has thus far failed to gain traction in Congress, Democrats have looked to the Federal Trade Commission to begin a privacy rule-making process under existing legislation.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., led top Senate Democrats in writing a letter to Lina Khan, the Federal Trade Commission chair, urging use of the agency to strengthen data privacy protections. The Build Back Better Act allocates $500 million for a new “privacy bureau” within the Federal Trade Commission tasked with implementing and enforcing data protections.

If confirmed, Bedoya will oversee the enforcement of privacy laws as well as the creation of new data protections the Federal Trade Commission is reportedly considering. This position would offer Bedoya considerable latitude to regulate how data companies collect and share information.

In a column for Slate written in September 2020, Bedoya targeted data analytics company Palantir and its relationship with Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a reason for new legal protections on data privacy.

Palantir’s “leadership has decided that the cost of its work for [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] is de minimis, that in the eyes of its clients and the investing public it simply does not matter,” Bedoya wrote. “As a Latino and an immigrant, I worry that on this point they will be right.”

Bedoya pointed to the fact that Palantir’s technology assists Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in accessing different databases, building profiles, visualizing data, and connecting data sources as an example of a practice harming illegal immigrants.

“Much of my work focuses on how surveillance affects immigrants and people of color,” Bedoya wrote. “Yet, even for me, it is hard to see the technology behind [Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s] brutality.”

Bedoya previously advocated for enlarging and empowering the Federal Trade Commission as a tool to combat data collection and consumer surveillance, pointing to the harms caused by “companies that track us to identify our weaknesses.”

“Surveillance isn’t a question of cookies on browsers. It’s a question of life or death,” Bedoya said in a call-to-action video with OpenMic. “It’s a question of, can you explore your sexuality in peace and without other people looking over your shoulder? It’s a question of whether you can stay in this country if you’re undocumented.”

Bedoya has also opposed the collaboration of state agencies and local law enforcement agencies with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, calling on such authorities to refuse to share data with the agency.

If confirmed, Bedoya would hand the Democrats a 3-2 majority in the Federal Trade Commission.

Bedoya declined to comment when reached by The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities for this original content, email

Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.