The New Jersey state Legislature set aside $5 million in the annual budget to help fund what it calls “community journalism,” which  critics say raises serious ethical questions regarding the influence it gives government over news coverage.

As local newspapers have seen circulation and advertising steadily decline in the digital age, the traditional business model for small market news outlets is no longer providing the necessary revenue to maintain a financially stable newspaper.

Adapting a once-unthinkable practice, akin to totalitarian regimes, the New Jersey Legislature included a $5 million line item for “community journalism” designed to keep small market outlets afloat.

The idea received some support from a major nonprofit educator in the journalism world.

Kelly McBride, senior vice president at Poynter Institute, told The New York Times that “given the dire situation, government funding has become an increasingly reasonable solution.”

Justin Bogie, a senior policy analyst in fiscal affairs at The Heritage Foundation, said in this case “it’s really up to [state officials] to determine how those funds should be used.”

But Bogie stressed that subsidizing newspapers isn’t a function of government.

“Funding journalism is inherently not a governmental role and therefore journalists should rely on private donations, advertising, and nonprofit grants to fund their coverage,” he said. “Relying on government funding could also potentially lead to a bias in the news coverage that the public receives.”

The New York Times reported that although state lawmakers budgeted $5 million, “proponents initially sought $100 million.”

The New Jersey budget stipulates that the money spent on “community journalism” must come exclusively from the auctioning of public television licenses, which brought in a total of $330 million last year.

Gov. Phil Murphy, a Democrat, signed the budget into law in early July.