Site icon The Daily Signal

State Department Is Misleading Americans About Russia’s Treaty Violations

Russian President Vladimir Putin. (Photo: Sergei Ilnitsky/POOL/EPA/Newscom)

The State Department isn’t being honest with Americans about Russia’s violations of arms control treaties and other politically binding commitments.

Take the State Department’s annual compliance report, which was published earlier this month. The report outlines U.S. and international compliance with arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements, both legally binding and political.

The State Department’s report shows that Russia continues to violate its arms control obligations, but only offers a limited discussion of Moscow’s violations. The report also fails to account for other known violations of Russia’s arms control treaties and politically binding commitments.

For instance, Russia continues to be in violation of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty). The State Department has determined that Russia has possessed, produced or flight-tested a ground-launched cruise missile (GLCM) in the range prohibited by the treaty. The report does not provide further details regarding the nature of the violation or the type of ground-launched cruise missile involved.

Further, the discussion regarding the implications of these violations for U.S. security and other interests is inadequate. The report only notes that the Obama administration believes “it is in the mutual security interests” that Russia remains a party to the treaty. The Russian calculus is clearly different, which the State Department fails to account for.

The State Department has proven itself disingenuous regarding public reporting on this issue. The report says that its previous classified versions note concerns regarding Russia’s compliance with the INF Treaty.

But the public versions of the report between 2011 and 2013 note no such concerns and give a false impression that Russia is fully complying with its INF Treaty obligations. Each of the administration’s previous compliance reports note that the U.S. has not raised any issues regarding potential violations.

While the INF Treaty violation is the most serious, Moscow continues to violate a plethora of other arms control agreements—and these violations also receive short shrift in the report. For instance, consider these violations:

The State Department included a summary page regarding the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, which has not entered into force and which the Senate has rejected in 1999. It notes that other parties to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty have not publicly defined the scope of nuclear testing moratorium, which makes compliance determinations difficult.

Yet this is inaccurate according to the Obama administration’s own analysis, which states “a thorough review of the history of the treaty negotiation process, as well as statements by world leaders and the negotiators of the agreement, shows that all states understand and accept the CTBT as a ‘zero-yield’ treaty.”

While the treaty itself does not precisely define what constitutes a nuclear weapons test, the Clinton administration took extraordinary steps to assure the Senate that their counterparts in Russia, China, France and the United Kingdom share the U.S. definition of a nuclear test which precludes any experiments that produce a nuclear yield. In the past, however, both Russia and China have been found conducting nuclear yield-producing experiments prohibited under the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

Lastly, Russia is undermining the Nonproliferation Treaty regime by threatening non-nuclear weapon states in Europe with nuclear attacks and is violating its political commitments to eliminate certain classes of tactical nuclear weapons under the Presidential Nuclear Initiatives.

The State Department is mum on both of these matters, and as such is doing the nation a disservice by failing to provide accurate information for an informed public debate on these important issues.

 

Exit mobile version